Mailing List Archive

Loading...

gcc@gcc.gnu.org

[Thread | Date] [Prev Month] [Next Month]

[Prev Page] [Next Page]

• The state of glibc libm Joseph S. Myers 2012/02/29
  • Re: The state of glibc libm David Miller 2012/02/29
• Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Bin.Cheng 2012/02/29
  • Re: RFC: Handle conditional expression in sccvn/fre/pre Richard Guenther 2012/02/29
• IVs optimization issue Aurelien Buhrig 2012/02/29
  • Re: IVs optimization issue Richard Guenther 2012/02/29
    • Re: IVs optimization issue Aurelien Buhrig 2012/02/29
      • Re: IVs optimization issue Richard Guenther 2012/02/29
      • Re: IVs optimization issue Aurelien Buhrig 2012/02/29
      • Re: IVs optimization issue Richard Guenther 2012/02/29
      • Re: IVs optimization issue Aurelien Buhrig 2012/02/29
• gcc-4.4-20120228 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/28
• random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report) Jay Freeman (saurik) 2012/02/27
  • Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report) Ian Lance Taylor 2012/02/28
    • Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report) Jay Freeman (saurik) 2012/02/28
      • Re: random commentary on -fsplit-stack (and a bug report) Ian Lance Taylor 2012/02/29
• Parma Polyhedra Library 0.12 Roberto Bagnara 2012/02/27
• GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2012-02-27) Richard Guenther 2012/02/27
• backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Peter Garbett 2012/02/27
  • Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Richard Guenther 2012/02/27
    • Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Peter Garbett 2012/02/27
    • Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Uros Bizjak 2012/02/27
      • Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Richard Guenther 2012/02/27
      • Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Uros Bizjak 2012/02/27
      • Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6 Jakub Jelinek 2012/02/27
• -floop-flatten and PR 52307 Thomas Koenig 2012/02/26
  • Re: -floop-flatten and PR 52307 Richard Guenther 2012/02/26
• gcc-4.7-20120225 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/25
• optimization report Mahmood Naderan 2012/02/25
  • Re: optimization report Jonathan Wakely 2012/02/25
• Bootstrapping and C++ compiler Gabriel Dos Reis 2012/02/25
  • Re: Bootstrapping and C++ compiler Marc Glisse 2012/02/25
• gcc-4.6-20120224 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/24
• inline assembly reed kotler 2012/02/24
  • Re: inline assembly Ian Lance Taylor 2012/02/24
• Proposal: Make TYPE_HASH != TYPE_UID Diego Novillo 2012/02/24
  • Re: Proposal: Make TYPE_HASH != TYPE_UID Richard Guenther 2012/02/26
• Is it a bug when use “<<”if the operator is out of the size "0~63" Yang Yueming 2012/02/24
  • Re: Is it a bug when use “<<”if the operator is out of the size "0~63" Miles Bader 2012/02/24
  • Re: Is it a bug when use “<<”if the operator is out of the size "0~63" Jonathan Wakely 2012/02/24
• A question about redundant PHI expression stmt Jiangning Liu 2012/02/24
  • Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt Richard Guenther 2012/02/24
  • Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt William J. Schmidt 2012/02/27
    • RE: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt Jiangning Liu 2012/02/27
    • Message not available
      • RE: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt Jiangning Liu 2012/02/28
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • RE: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt Jiangning Liu 2012/02/28
    • Message not available
      • Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt Richard Guenther 2012/02/28
      • Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt William J. Schmidt 2012/02/28
      • Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt William J. Schmidt 2012/02/28
      • Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt William J. Schmidt 2012/02/28
• gcc-4.5-20120223 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/23
• Function-Specific Optimization Branch Iyer, Balaji V 2012/02/23
• GCC 4.6.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek 2012/02/23
• Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Patrick Marlier 2012/02/23
  • Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Patrick Marlier 2012/02/23
    • Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Jack Howarth 2012/02/23
      • Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Patrick Marlier 2012/02/23
      • Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Jack Howarth 2012/02/25
• error in gcc version 4.6.2 ??? SchmiTTT 2012/02/23
  • Re: error in gcc version 4.6.2 ??? Andreas Schwab 2012/02/23
  • Re: error in gcc version 4.6.2 ??? Dennis Clarke 2012/02/23
• Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken? J K 2012/02/23
  • RE: Differences in GCC and ICC compiled objects, GCC relocations broken? Iyer, Balaji V 2012/02/23
• Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 Thomas Schwinge 2012/02/22
  • Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 Kaz Kojima 2012/02/22
    • Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 Thomas Schwinge 2012/02/24
  • Re: Simulator testing for sh and sh64 Thomas Schwinge 2012/02/23
• toplev.c: Question on __gnu_lto markers in .comm Georg-Johann Lay 2012/02/22
  • Re: toplev.c: Question on __gnu_lto markers in .comm Richard Guenther 2012/02/22
• gcc-4.4-20120221 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/21
• Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc 嘉谟 2012/02/21
  • Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc Andrew Haley 2012/02/21
  • Message not available
    • Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc 嘉谟 2012/02/22
      • Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc James Courtier-Dutton 2012/02/22
      • Re: Some confuse about the pass of the arguments by gcc James Courtier-Dutton 2012/02/22
• GCC and x86intrin.h header Erotavlas_turbo 2012/02/21
  • Re: GCC and x86intrin.h header Ian Lance Taylor 2012/02/21
• How to suppress frame pointer usage by default? Konstantin Vladimirov 2012/02/21
  • Re: How to suppress frame pointer usage by default? Ian Lance Taylor 2012/02/21
• Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? Ulrich Weigand 2012/02/20
  • Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? Richard Guenther 2012/02/21
    • Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? Andrew Pinski 2012/02/21
    • [WIP PATCH] Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? Ulrich Weigand 2012/02/28
      • Re: [WIP PATCH] Re: Inefficient end-of-loop value computation - missed optimization somewhere? Richard Guenther 2012/02/28
• [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. Kumar, Venkataramanan 2012/02/19
  • Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. Marc Glisse 2012/02/19
    • Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. Richard Guenther 2012/02/20
      • RE: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3 pattern. Kumar, Venkataramanan 2012/02/20
• GCC: OpenMP posix pthread Erotavlas_turbo 2012/02/19
  • Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread Tim Prince 2012/02/19
  • Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread Erotavlas_turbo 2012/02/19
  • Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread Erotavlas_turbo 2012/02/21
    • Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread Jakub Jelinek 2012/02/21
  • Re: GCC: OpenMP posix pthread Erotavlas_turbo 2012/02/22
• gcc-4.7-20120218 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/18
• fortran/parse.c Mads Jensen 2012/02/18
  • Re: fortran/parse.c Tobias Burnus 2012/02/18
• gcc-4.6-20120217 is now available gccadmin 2012/02/17
• BEWARE: PLATEAU + SUCCESSFACTORS + SAP Paul Rahme 2012/02/17
• Wrong REG_UNUSED notes for PARALLEL insns? Georg-Johann Lay 2012/02/17

[Prev Page] [Next Page]

[Prev Month] [Next Month]