Loading...

geowanking@geowanking.org

[Prev] Thread [Next]  |  [Prev] Date [Next]

Re: [Geowanking] Where has all the geowanking gone ? - topic for discussion Jeffrey Warren Thu Feb 02 05:01:10 2012

oh damn, Allan beat me to it... anyways heres my thoughts:
--------

What about raster geodata? -- http://mapknitter.org and
http://publiclaboratory.org/tool/balloon-mapping show you how to collect,
composite, and publish your own raster maps. I think some people at first
wonder why, but you only have to look at some of the maps people are making
to see why mapmaking is a lot more subjective than we thought:

* A map of OccupyOakland days before it was shut down (a perspective you
won't see up on Google...):
http://publiclaboratory.org/map/occupy-oakland-10am/2011-11-2
* A map of pollution plumes in urban waterways:
http://mapknitter.org/map/search?q=newtown,
http://mapknitter.org/tms/2011-08-06-brooklyn-newtowncreek/openlayers.html
* A map of illegal logging in Sumava, Czech Republic:
http://mapknitter.org/map/search?q=sumava

(I should mention that if you want to get started balloon mapping quickly,
you should get in on the Kickstarter to get your own balloon mapping kit:
http://kck.st/x5vsyA)

Beyond that, what about multispectral raster mapping? Public Lab folks have
been replicating NASA earth observation techniques by hacking cameras for
infrared vegetation analysis, landfill monitoring, etc:

http://publiclaboratory.org/tool/near-infrared-camera
http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/mapknitter-multispectral

There's a world of geodata out there which doesn't come from big corps or
gov'ts, and tells a very different story.

Jeff

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, William J. Spat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Mention of this list’s quietness got me to wondering why?****
>
> ** **
>
> My feeling is that good maps and 3d location data are in the process of
> becoming commoditised, so there’s less about which to fantasize.****
>
> ** **
>
> I mean, three-dimensional spatial data is being built out to the point
> that if it is a lasting visible structure, it’s going to be on the map.
> And we tend to fantasize about the unknown.  So what’s left about which to
> geowank?****
>
> ** **
>
> I suppose there’s a historical dimension – putting Paxton’s crystal palace
> back on the map and that kind of thing.****
>
> ** **
>
> One area that intrigues me – and probably because I know so little about
> it -  is the mapping of non-spatial data.  I mean stuff that is associated
> with a point or area, but is not itself three-dimensional in any meaningful
> sense.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> For example, I once read of a riff on  forestry software used to predict
> optimum snow conditions on ski hills.  So presumably inputs that were
> relevant to tree growth (precipitation, sunlight, slope, and so on) were
> mapped to conditions relevant to really good snow for sliding sports.  This
> might be an example –and one that has been commercialised, at least in a
> ski-hill consultancy.****
>
> ** **
>
> What else might there be?****
>
> ** **
>
> We have had wikis of crime scenes placed on maps (the crimes generally
> having occurred at a location, but not having a lasting visible structure
> {leaving aside architectural crimes ;-)}), and there are great wikis of
> transient spatial activities (http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/ is a
> favourite of mine)****
>
> ** **
>
> What else?****
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve fantasized about maps that input to policy decisions.  For example,
> it’s a tired (pardon the pun) saw that cyclists systematically disobey
> traffic rules.  To which, as a cyclist,  I counter that the number of
> infractions by motorists far exceeds those by cyclists since disregard for
> speed limits by motorists is endemic.  Could we map those areas of
> excessive speed as we have live maps of congestion?  Pinpoint potential
> profit centres for Treasury?****
>
> ** **
>
> I supposed the challenge is (as it was in the early days of this list)
> getting good data.  For example, I read that one good argument for the
> establishment of marine parks came from records of large fish catches after
> an exclusion zone was established for the moon shots at Cape Canaveral.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> And even if good data can be found and geocoded, it is not really ‘geo,’
> so perhaps harder to manage with our systems and approaches?****
>
> ** **
>
> As smartphones get more sensors, perhaps we can get them to harvest more
> data?  Or just tap into more silos of data that are already there, but not
> adequately mapped?  As we have all been turned into wardrivers by Apple and
> their ilk?****
>
> ** **
>
> I  am reminded of a short story from Peter Carey’s “Fat Man in history”.
> But that’s another topic for discussion….****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Anselm Hook
> *Sent:* 12-Jan-12 09:20
> *To:* S. E.
> *Cc:* geowanking
> *Subject:* Re: [Geowanking] When and Where is WhereCamp SF/Bay Area?****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm not doing it this year but Steve C say's he'll pick it up - looking
> forward to attending :-)****
>
> ** **
>
> a****
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, S. E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:****
>
> I have not seen this posted and the list has been awful quiet (aside from
> LinkedIn requests ;)****
>
> ** **
>
> O'Reilly's Where conference is 4/2-4, so I imagine it will be 3/31-4/1 or
> 4/8-9, but would be great to know now for scheduling.****
>
> ** **
>
> Looking forward to it!****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Steven Echtman ****
>
>  ****
>
> *HearPlanet*****
>
> *www.HearPlanet.com <http://www.hearplanet.com/>*****
>
> *iPhone 
> Apps<http://ax.search.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSearch.woa/wa/search?entity=software&media=all&page=1&restrict=true&startIndex=0&term=hearplanet>
> * | Android Apps <https://market.android.com/developer?pub=HearPlanet>****
>
> ** **
>
> Ph/Fx: 415-324-8555****
>
> Cl: 310-962-1021****
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> @anselm 415 215 4856 http://twitter.com/anselm****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org