[greasemonkey-dev] Re: 0.9.1 status sizzlemctwizzle Mon Jan 24 22:00:36 2011
On Jan 24, 11:21 pm, Anthony Lieuallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the case of Personas, they are simply overwriting the showView() > function, to change its contents. Destroying whatever was in place. We > are, instead, replacing it with a method that only chooses whether to > call our version, or the version that existed before us (whatever it > might be). But if Personas runs after Greasemonkey (I don't know > anymore exactly what controls extension running order), then it simply > destroys and overwrites that. If we ran second, we'd be good citizens > and not break them. But we don't, at least not always. Is there could we put a watch on the showView function and if somebody changes it we could overwrite it again with our function that chooses which function to call? I think so. Give we a second to try out this idea. > Ironic that Stylish's hacked up job doesn't conflict with Persona's > clobbering one. Two wrongs make a right, eh? Haha it appears so. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-dev?hl=en.
- [greasemonkey-dev] 0.9.1 status Anthony Lieuallen 2011/01/24
- [greasemonkey-dev] Re: 0.9.1 status sizzlemctwizzle 2011/01/24
- [greasemonkey-dev] Re: 0.9.1 status vBm 2011/01/24
- [greasemonkey-dev] Re: 0.9.1 status arantius 2011/01/24