Re: CONDSTORE plus UID EXPUNGE undefined?

  
actually we don't nest locks in our implementation of move for this 
very reason.  
 
but for a DB-based index, move can be as simple as an update query on 
the folder field for a message.
 
Adrien

------ Original Message ------
From: "Arnt Gulbrandsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adrien W. de Croy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Bron Gondwana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 29/03/2012 11:16:09 p.m.
Subject: Re: CONDSTORE plus UID EXPUNGE undefined?
> Bron is right, at least for some architectures. But his argument is
> really the same as I've heard umpteen times for move: Carrying out the
> copy/store/expunge sequence without the lock COPY can drop early has too
> many failure modes and handling them requires too much clientside code.
>
> Having a lock gives you the advantages of the lock at the cost of the lock.
>
> Arnt