|
Loading...
|
ietf-openpgp@imc.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Werner Koch Wed Sep 05 12:46:34 2001
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:55:02 -0400, Michael Young said: > But this wouldn't be an OpenPGP format. The OpenPGP secret key packet Right. It is an implementation detail which would help to avoid unprotecting and re-protecting when transferring keys. > Personally, I find it unlikely that an implementation would cut off > the public key parameters at all. It would have to do so very I know devices which do not have enough storage capacity for all parameters. > public parts. Lastly, it seems wise to perform consistency checks > between the public/private parts even in the presence of an MDC. I don't see a reason for this, if the MDC would not provide a sound consistency check, what else would do? Werner -- Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est. Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates, (continued)
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates Jon Callas 2001/09/06
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates Michael Young 2001/09/06
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates Jon Callas 2001/09/06
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates Werner Koch 2001/09/06
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates Michael Young 2001/09/07
- Re: Identifying revoked certificates Werner Koch 2001/09/08
Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Florian Weimer 2001/09/05
- Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Michael Young 2001/09/05
Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Werner Koch 2001/09/05
- Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Michael Young 2001/09/05
- Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Werner Koch 2001/09/05 <=
- Re: Fixing the secret keys, and a small apology Jon Callas 2001/09/06