|
Loading...
|
ietf-sasl@imc.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Simon Josefsson Mon Sep 08 11:02:50 2008
Kurt Zeilenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> >> Alexey Melnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Frank Ellermann wrote: >>> >>>> Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> This group will produce a document revising SASLprep [RFC4013] >>>>> to improve Unicode version agility while maintaining RFC 4013 >>>>> behavior when used with RFC 4013 mandated version of Unicode. >>>>> The outcome of this work will be a Standards Track RFC replacing >>>>> RFC 4013. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Does that allow for "abandon SASLprep in favour of net-UTF8" ? >>>> >>>> >>> A very good question indeed. >> >> Given that few have implemented RFC 4013 I'm not sure that backwards >> compatibility with it has to be an absolute mandate in the SASL WG >> charter. > > My view is that it's not an "absolute mandate". As I noted in my > response to Frank's comments, my intent was to keep a narrow focus on > the work. I specially don't want to revisit discussions such as > "Should character X be excluded?". I want to limit the work to > replacing stringprep tables with Unicode properties. SASLprepbis(x) > == SASLprep(x) for all x (where x is well formed Unicode 3.2 text). Limiting the work would preclude considering Net-UTF8, as far as I can tell. >> Given the PR-29 problem (NFKC output has been altered for some code >> points in later Unicode versions), perfect backwards compatibility may >> not be something to strive for anyway. > > How about "backwards compatibility for characters used in practice"? > PR-29 issues were limited to characters which do not occur in practice. That would work. >> Even though NFKC was >> used by StringPrep for domain names, I'm not convinced it is the best >> choice for passwords. > > I note that SASLprep is also used for user names. Decisions need to > be made not just based on "best choice for passwords" but "best choice > for user names and passwords". One could also use Net-UTF8 for usernames and SASLprep for passwords. /Simon
- Proposed SASL WG charter description Kurt Zeilenga 2008/09/04
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Frank Ellermann 2008/09/08
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Alexey Melnikov 2008/09/08
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Simon Josefsson 2008/09/08
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Kurt Zeilenga 2008/09/08
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Simon Josefsson 2008/09/08 <=
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Kurt Zeilenga 2008/09/08
- Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Frank Ellermann 2008/09/08
Re: Proposed SASL WG charter description Kurt Zeilenga 2008/09/08