[Prev] Thread [Next]  |  [Prev] Date [Next]

Re: ant optional? Andy Jefferson Thu Dec 09 00:00:20 2010

> You do not want to mark it as not optional since IIRC that would mean that
> anything building against jdo-api.jar would have to have ant in the
>  CLASSPATH. We do not want that.

Although maybe the "test" scope would override that requirement?

No subsititute for actually trying it with a clean M2 repo, and 
building/running a simple JDO project against it (with clean M2 repo also).

DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)