|
Loading...
|
ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts beamends Wed Dec 09 08:00:47 2009
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 22:30 +0800, David Godfrey wrote: > Just thought of another question. > > How many vendors do you have on the system? > Possibly also relevant how many vendors do you have for each part? > > David G > Hi David, we have 21 vendors, but only ever one for each part. Cheers Richard > Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, beamends wrote: > > > > > > > "DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: duplicate key violates unique > > > constraint "partsvendor_pkey" at LedgerSMB/IC.pm line 529. > > > > > > Error! > > > > > > INSERT INTO partsvendor > > > (vendor_id, parts_id, > > > partnumber, lastcost, > > > leadtime, curr) > > > VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) > > > ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "partsvendor_pkey" > > > " > > > > > > > Richard, > > > > I'm not a perl coder, nor a LSMB developer, but I've encountered this > > type > > of SQL error in my approximate reasoning models. The problem is the existing > > key and the solution is to write the SQL statement as: > > > > INSERT or REPLACE into ... > > > > If the primary key does not exist the new row is inserted; else if the > > primary > > key exists, the column attribute values are replaced with those in the > > statement. > > > > An alternative approach to accomplishing the same thing is to first > > "DELETE > > from <tablename> where ..." followed by the INSERT statement. > > > > HTH, > > > > Rich > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Return on Information: > > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > > Get the facts. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Ledger-smb-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ledger-smb-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
- [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts beamends 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts Rich Shepard 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts beamends 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts Rich Shepard 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts David Godfrey 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts beamends 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts David Godfrey 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts David Godfrey 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts beamends 2009/12/09 <=
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts David Richardson 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts Chris Travers 2009/12/09
Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts Chris Travers 2009/12/09 Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts lai 2009/12/09
- Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Problem With Saving Parts Chris Travers 2009/12/09