|
Loading...
|
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Graham Percival Tue Feb 21 13:00:16 2012
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:49:21PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Uh, Graham? Just fixed another regression discovered by an LSR failure > and pushed to staging. It would appear that this needs to be in 2.16 > according to our policies. Well, there's already 2 Critical issues, and I think that 2335 should qualify as well but I don't feel like arguing at the moment. So no worries about having 2.16 happen unexpectedly. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Graham Percival 2012/02/21 <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Graham Percival 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Graham Percival 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/22