|
Loading...
|
lilypond-user@gnu.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup Tue Feb 21 09:01:52 2012
Thomas Morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi David, > > 2012/2/20 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Thomas Morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Hi David, Phil, >>> >>> I'll be offline for two days, perhaps three. (Visiting a funeral, ~800 >>> km away from my home) >>> May I ask you to continue the updating work? >> >> I'm just going to take a look at the snippet you analyzed. Ok, I am now rather annoyed. I was totally sure that somebody mentioned \put-adjacent in the context of convertrules, and now doing a web search I find that it was merely used as an example for localized messages and nobody had a problem with it not doing any conversion. It is a 2.11.55 rule. Now I fixed the conversion. Suggestions what I am going to do with it? Bother with checking it in? Anybody with a test case?
-- David Kastrup
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Nalesnik 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Carl Sorensen 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Nalesnik 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Nalesnik 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Phil Holmes 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/21 <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Nalesnik 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Graham Percival 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution Thomas Morley 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Nalesnik 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Nalesnik 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution David Kastrup 2012/02/24