|
Loading...
|
lilypond-user@gnu.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: time signature question David Kastrup Sun Feb 26 11:00:59 2012
Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi David, > >> this is almost cute enough for a bounty: > > It works exactly as I had hoped. > What's a reasonable fee for your effort? Hard to say. Writing this up now was good for about €18 (5 minutes was a bit boastful as an estimate, even though this went through without major puzzlers). If you want to show your appreciation that I was responsible for a lot of the infrastructure actually turning this into a straightforward job, you can take your pick of either a) doubling the amount b) creating and "issueing" a nice snippet from it (probably using something like \repeat unfold 7 c'8. or so as a somewhat more illustrative content) and going through all the motions until it has made its way into the LilyPond documentation. I think that this code would make for a nice snippet. It exercises a fair bit of functionality without major distractions in between. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- time signature question Kieren MacMillan 2012/02/26
- Re: time signature question Kieren MacMillan 2012/02/26
- Re: time signature question David Kastrup 2012/02/26
- Re: time signature question Kieren MacMillan 2012/02/26
- Re: time signature question David Kastrup 2012/02/26 <=
- Re: time signature question Hans Aberg 2012/02/26
- Re: time signature question David Kastrup 2012/02/27
- Re: time signature question Kieren MacMillan 2012/02/27
- Re: time signature question Neil Thornock 2012/02/28
- Re: time signature question David Kastrup 2012/02/28
- Re: time signature question Kieren MacMillan 2012/02/28
- Re: time signature question James 2012/02/28
- Re: time signature question Kieren MacMillan 2012/02/28