[Prev] Thread [Next]  |  [Prev] Date [Next]

Re: Log4J 2 Ralph Goers Mon Feb 06 09:07:22 2012

On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:

> On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for about 2 years
>> now.  It now consists of a fairly large body of code with fairly
>> decent documentation. I feel it is ready to come out of my
>> experimental branch and onto its own main branch where others will
>> hopefully feel more inclined to participate.
> For the benefit of the log4(X != j) communities, can you give some sort
> of elevator pitch for log4j 2.0?  What is different?  Given that the
> other projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be good
> to know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach.
> Don't hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit I
> haven't looked for one, yet.

You can find the latest documentation at