|
Loading...
|
quartz-dev@lists.apple.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan Fri Dec 22 06:00:46 2006
On Dec 21, 2006, at 10:37 PM, David M. Cotter wrote:
can i keep that imageRef around forever, and whenever I CGContextDrawImage it gets the bits from the provider??that way i don't have to keep allocate / blit / deallocate per frame?okay i answered my own question. the answer is no. i also found out that there is no time spent in the calls to create the CGImage, all the time is spent in the call to draw it. (ie: even if i ONLY call CGContextDrawImage() on each frame, using a pre-created image, i still get 9 fps.
That's definitely strange, and I'm at a loss to explain that right this moment... I do have an app that is drawing a sample image that is rotating about it's center and I'm getting better than 30 fps.
-- Reality is what, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. Failure is not an option. It is a privilege reserved for those who try. David Duncan _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartz-dev mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartz-dev/alexiscircle%40gmail.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/21
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan 2006/12/22 <=
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance Bill Monk 2006/12/22
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/25
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan 2006/12/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/28
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan 2006/12/28
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David M. Cotter 2006/12/28
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance David Duncan 2006/12/29
- Re: QD -> Quartz = poor performance Solra Bizna 2006/12/29