|
Loading...
|
repo-discuss@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: draft changes Martin Fick Fri Feb 17 12:00:52 2012
On Friday, February 03, 2012 02:53:03 pm Edwin Kempin wrote: > 2012/2/3 Martin Fick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Friday, February 03, 2012 01:26:46 pm Saša Živkov wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Edwin Kempin > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > this week I was playing around with pushing draft > > > > changes to Gerrit. It's a great feature, but I have > > > > some questions about it. When I have several draft > > > > changes that depend on each other and I publish the > > > > tip draft change. Any reviewer who fetches this > > > > published change can now see all predecssors draft > > > > changes which are still unpublished in the git > > > > history. Is this indended? > > > > > > This is how Git fetch works. > > I know, my question was rather if it should be possible > to publish a change if the predecessors are not > published yet? Maybe it would be simplest if we just prevented this in the first place instead of adding a queuing mechanism the way that submit works? Make it so you cannot publish any patchset/change if its dependency is not published, -Martin -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. which is a member of Code Aurora Forum -- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] More info at http://groups.google.com/group/repo-discuss?hl=en
- draft changes Edwin Kempin 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Saša Živkov 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Martin Fick 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Edwin Kempin 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Martin Fick 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Edwin Kempin 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Martin Fick 2012/02/03
- Re: draft changes Martin Fick 2012/02/17 <=
- Re: draft changes Edwin Kempin 2012/02/17
- Re: draft changes Saša Živkov 2012/02/18