|
Loading...
|
repo-discuss@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Diego Celix Thu Feb 23 15:01:02 2012
Hi Marcus, Chris I didn't notice about your replies until now. I'm also very interested in seeing this functionallity upstreamed, but I don't know how many time I will be able to spend on it. I will try to get my self up to date with gerrit and the new changes since my last rebase and I will let you know my planning then. I'm sorry for this late reply... Regards, Diego On Feb 16, 4:19 pm, "Marcus D. Hanwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 6 2011, 7:13 pm, Diego Celix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Finally it seems that I gathered enough time to finish this task. I've > >> reordered the commits and grouped them in a series of functional > >> changes. I hope this way it can be easier to be reviewed. > > >> I'm not really up to date with the situation of the officialgerrit > >> instance, and I don't know if there are any official mirror or any > >> instructions to follow in order to submit the code to be reviewed. So > >> meanwhile, I've pushed the changes to github > >> (https://github.com/dcelix/tools_gerrit > >> into the topic_reviews branch ). This way, the people interested in > >> this functionallity can see the code and try it with the most up-to > >> date version ofgerritI have. > > > Now thegerritserver is back up are you planning on rebasing your > > changes and pushing them forreview? We have been working with the > >topicreviewfunctionality here at kitware and are keen to see it > > upstreamed in some form, we have a bunch changes/fixes based on it. > > It has been a little over half a month, and we have a running server > testing out many of these features (along with several bug fixes and > extensions we added). We are eager to start getting these features > intoGerrit, Diego could you upload yourtopicforreviewat the newGerritinstance? > > If this is not possible, we would appreciate input on how we might > proceed in getting these changes integrated. The Qt project is also > using many of these enhancements, and has a wish to see the features > added upstream as far as I know. > > Thanks, > > Marcus -- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] More info at http://groups.google.com/group/repo-discuss?hl=en
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Chris Harris 2012/02/03
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Chengwei 2012/02/15
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Edwin Kempin 2012/02/15
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Chengwei 2012/02/20
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Thomas Broyer 2012/02/20
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Marcus D. Hanwell 2012/02/16
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Diego Celix 2012/02/23 <=
- Re: Gerrit Topic Review Functionallity Marcus D. Hanwell 2012/02/23