Loading...

sagedevel@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next]  [Prev] Date [Next]
[sagedevel] integration bug, segfault Jonathan Bober Tue Feb 21 18:00:37 2012
I didn't actually expect the following to work very well, but I definitely did not expect the output that I did get: sage: def IC9E(K, j, a, b, epsilon): ....: g(t) = 2*pi*i * (a  i*a + 2*b*K + i*2*b*K)*(1+i)*t  (1+i)^2 * 2*i*b*t^2 ....: f(t) = t^j * exp(g(t)) ....: return integral(f, (t, 0, infinity)) sage: IC9E(112, 0, 0.00084696102822690023, 0.044171315635412135, exp(20)) # suddenly I get a lot of advertisements for a popular question/answer website... [...] ;;; ;;; Binding stack overflow. ;;; Jumping to the outermost toplevel prompt ;;; [...] ;;; ;;; Stack overflow. ;;; Jumping to the outermost toplevel prompt ;;; [...] /home/bober/sage5.0.beta2/spkg/bin/sage: line 304: 3765 Segmentation fault sageipython "$@" i The [...] omits a lot of output (from maxima?). The above was on 5.0.beta2, but it happens at sagenb.org as well. I haven't opened a track ticket because I would prefer to put something more specific than the subject of this email. I guess that there is some sort of bug in maxima, maybe, but also maybe a bug in Sage, since (maybe) Sage shouldn't crash when the maxima subprocess crashes.  To post to this group, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sagedevel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
 [sagedevel] integration bug, segfault Jonathan Bober 2012/02/21 <=
 [sagedevel] Re: integration bug, segfault kcrisman 2012/02/21
 Re: [sagedevel] Re: integration bug, segfault D. S. McNeil 2012/02/21
 [sagedevel] Re: integration bug, segfault kcrisman 2012/02/21
 Re: [sagedevel] Re: integration bug, segfault Dan Drake 2012/02/22
 [sagedevel] Re: integration bug, segfault kcrisman 2012/02/22