|
Loading...
|
sage-support@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form kcrisman Fri Feb 17 08:01:10 2012
In some previous incarnation, where Sage used Maxima for things like
this, your simplification happened.
(%i1) 1/sqrt(5);
1
(%o1) -------
sqrt(5)
(%i2) sqrt(5)/5;
1
(%o2) -------
sqrt(5)
Now we use Ginac for basic symbolic stuff. Once in a while we (i.e.,
Burcin) changes some internal representation, or Ginac does. But in
general I think it just goes for positive powers - you may want to
read its documentation. In particular, "sqrt" is not a builtin
function ("square root (not a GiNaC function, rather an alias for
pow(x, numeric(1, 2)))"), so the behavior is analogous to
sage: 1/5^(1/3)
1/5*5^(2/3)
Naturally, GiNaC is Not a CAS, so perhaps that is one reason for the
distinction. You are also right about black arts! So I don't pretend
to judge Maxima *or* Ginac on this one.
I'm sorry if that doesn't help, but it might give you some background,
at least.
- kcrisman
--
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
- [sage-support] Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form Mark Rahner 2012/02/17
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form kcrisman 2012/02/17 <=
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form Mark Rahner 2012/02/18
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form Dox 2012/02/20
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form kcrisman 2012/02/20
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form Nils Bruin 2012/02/20
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form Mark Rahner 2012/02/21
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form JamesHDavenport 2012/02/22
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form Mark Rahner 2012/02/22
- [sage-support] Re: Simplification Issue Implicates Canonical Form JamesHDavenport 2012/02/22