|
Loading...
|
sage-support@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
[sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Simon King Tue Feb 21 07:00:35 2012
Hi Laurent, On 21 Feb., 14:24, Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it normal ? With older versions of sage the same docstring was working. Really? I doubt it. Your doc test will work if and only if "my_function" is defined in sage.all if and only if "my_function" is available directly after starting an interactive Sage session. So, you should add an import statement in front of your doc test, because otherwise Sage can not know what my_function is referring to and thus rightfully complains. I don't think that this has ever been different. Best regards, Simon -- To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
- [sage-support] sage -t has changed recently ? Laurent 2012/02/21
- [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Keshav Kini 2012/02/21
- [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Simon King 2012/02/21 <=
- [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Keshav Kini 2012/02/21
- Re: [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Laurent 2012/02/21
- Re: [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Starx 2012/02/21
- Re: [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? William Stein 2012/02/21
- [sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? Jason Grout 2012/02/21
[sage-support] Re: sage -t has changed recently ? John H Palmieri 2012/02/21
- Re: [sage-support] sage -t has changed recently ? Justin C. Walker 2012/02/21
- Re: [sage-support] docstring for submodules [was sage -t has changed recently ?] Laurent 2012/02/22
- Re: [sage-support] docstring for submodules [was sage -t has changed recently ?] John Cremona 2012/02/22