|
Loading...
|
torqueusers@supercluster.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
RE: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov Thu Aug 31 19:50:38 2006
It may have to do with OS. Mine is running on FreeBSD 4.10. Currently it is 390M. Stripping is not a big deal. Some small constant amount of memory is fine. It keeps growing - that is a problem. And it is not clear that the crash in question is related to the leak. -----Original Message----- From: Ronny T. Lampert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:18 AM To: Alexander Saydakov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash > BTW, pbs_sched seems to have a memory leak. When I restarted the thing > yesterday its footprint was about 50M. Now, slightly more than a day later, > it is 225M already. It could be unrelated to the crash in question though. That I definately can't confirm. root 26682 0.0 0.1 4644 2856 ? S< Jan26 0:40 pbs_server -t root 26687 0.0 0.1 3488 2516 ? S< Jan26 0:06 pbs_sched -a This is with an currently idle 2.0.0p7 running since 26th of January. In 1.2.X there were some bad leaks. Also try to build without "-g" and strip your binaries afterwards. Cheers, Ronny _______________________________________________ torqueusers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
- [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov 2006/08/31
- Re: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Garrick Staples 2006/08/31
- RE: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov 2006/08/31
- Re: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Garrick Staples 2006/08/31
- RE: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov 2006/08/31
- Re: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Denise Berendes 2006/08/31
- RE: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov 2006/08/31
- RE: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov 2006/08/31
- Re: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Ronny T. Lampert 2006/08/31
- RE: [torqueusers] pbs_sched crash Alexander Saydakov 2006/08/31 <=