|
Loading...
|
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Using biosdevname by default? Matthew Garrett Wed Feb 08 21:00:30 2012
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:51:59AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:06:50PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > This is similar to what RHEL6 is doing. They enable biosdevname by > > default only a limited subset of Dell machines ( > > http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0644.html). > > It's interesting that this appears to be at variance with what Fedora is > doing. Of course, RHEL can take advantage of the separate broad testing > work done in Fedora, and then minimise the risk for their enterprise > distribution. We don't have that luxury in Ubuntu. The change in RHEL was limited to a subset of machines since it was made in a point release of an already shipped OS. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
- Using biosdevname by default? Colin Watson 2012/02/03
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Stéphane Graber 2012/02/03
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Scott Ritchie 2012/02/05
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Stéphane Graber 2012/02/05
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Robbie Williamson 2012/02/06
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Mario Limonciello 2012/02/06
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Colin Watson 2012/02/06
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Matthew Garrett 2012/02/08 <=
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? James M. Leddy 2012/02/07
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Colin Watson 2012/02/07
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Stéphane Graber 2012/02/07
- Re: Using biosdevname by default? Colin Watson 2012/02/06
Re: Using biosdevname by default? Martin Pitt 2012/02/05