|
Loading...
|
users@spamassassin.apache.org
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen Mon Nov 30 09:00:31 2009
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> > On 30.11.09 16:41, Per Jessen wrote: >> >> I could, but it won't help - rest assured it has the headers. >> >> Anyway, how about a way to make spamd refuse to process a message >> >> when it appears to to have any? > >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> > which MTA do you use? How do you plug SA in? > > On 30.11.09 17:06, Per Jessen wrote: >> MTA is postfix, I call spamd directly using the spamc protocol (but >> not spamc). > > directly from where? do you use spamd as SMTP filter? (can it be > done?) Yes, it can be done - I have my own smtp proxy which calls spamd. (amongst other things). >> > where do those messages come from? >> >> For instance a couple from msg.oleane.net, but it varies. > > is that regular mail? Wouldn't it be better to exclude scanning mail > that came from msg.oleane.net ? Apart from very few internal exceptions, all mail is scanned - I whitelist based on origin, but everything is scanned. /Per Jessen, Zürich
- Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). d . hill 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). d . hill 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Matus UHLAR - fantomas 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Matus UHLAR - fantomas 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30 <=
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). John Hardin 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). Per Jessen 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). John Hardin 2009/11/30
- Re: Is there a way of forcing spamd not to process malformed messages? (NO_RELAYS, NO_RECEIVED etc). David B Funk 2009/11/30