RE: Bean Introspection

Im using PublicFieldUberspect developed by Shinobu Kawai

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Bubna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 3:19 AM
To: Velocity Users List
Subject: Re: Bean Introspection

Are you using the methodizer or the uberspect?

What happens when you do $UserObj.StringArr1 without the #foreach loop?

On 8/25/06, Gyanesh M Khanolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Nathan for your links.
>
> I did a quick test and basic types and Collections seem to work. But
> something like this does not seem to work:
>
> public User[] StringArr1        = new User[2];
>
> #foreach ($usr in $UserObj.StringArr1)
>         $usr.FName
> #end
>
> I get the output : $usr.FName and not the value in it.
>
> Did the default array type work for you guys?
>
> Thanks again for your quick response.
> Gyanesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Bubna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 2:43 AM
> To: Velocity Users List
> Subject: Re: Bean Introspection
>
> Currently there are two ways you can do this:
>
>
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/docs/api/org/apache/velocity/app/FieldMet
> hodizer.html
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/PublicFieldUberspect
>
> On 8/25/06, Gyanesh M Khanolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have read in many forums for requests to read public fields ALSO
incase
> > the getters are missing. But it seems we are still going by the JavaBean
> > specification which allows us to access the property ONLY via a getter
> > variable.
> >
> >
> >
> > Preferably we would want to avoid the painful getters as it bloats up
our
> > already existing code.
> >
> >
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to reconsider this approach where
> > $UserObj.FirstName will check with the getters : getFirstName() /
> > getfirstName() and if both were not found, then it accesses the public
> > variable FirstName.
> >
> >
> >
> > Introduction of this feature would be of great help as it helps us to
> reduce
> > writing additional code which is often of no use.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Gyanesh
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/427 - Release Date: 8/24/2006
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/427 - Release Date: 8/24/2006



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]