|
Loading...
|
versionone-users@googlegroups.com
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
RE: Production vs. Development Defects Jim.Ashe Fri Mar 02 07:02:08 2012
The easy answer is use an internal/external button (you can create one of these as a custom entry). We have found that can be misused, so we categorize external defects as those specifically associated to a service call in our CRM system. That way we can track exactly where it came from and there is no argument about if it is REALLY external or not. Hope This Helps, jim From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Johns Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Robert Turley; Celeste Garcia; Karen Kelley Subject: Production vs. Development Defects We are using the Defect work item type for both issues found in released code and also issues found in test as we develop new code. We want to start distinquishing which defects were found in production and which defects were a result of the QA/Testing process for new code. Anyone have a best practice for this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VersionOne-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versionone-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VersionOne-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versionone-users?hl=en.
- Production vs. Development Defects Todd Johns 2012/03/02
- RE: Production vs. Development Defects Jim.Ashe 2012/03/02 <=
- RE: Production vs. Development Defects Todd Johns 2012/03/02
- RE: Production vs. Development Defects David Shaffer 2012/03/02
- RE: Production vs. Development Defects John.Ainsworth 2012/03/02
- Re: Production vs. Development Defects Michael Depaoli 2012/03/02