python-dev
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Christian Heimes Thu Jul 12 18:06:08 2007
Steven Bethard wrote: > I'd probably go with something a little more restrictive, maybe: > > r'self.assert_\(\S+ == \S+\)' > > Something like that ought to have fewer false positives. Woops! You are right. Even your pattern has caused some false positives but I've reread the patch and removed the offending lines. I'm going to upload another patch as soon as I have verified mine again. Christian _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexiscircle%40gmail.com
- [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Guido van Rossum
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Christian Heimes
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Thomas Heller
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Guido van Rossum
- Message not available
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Steve Holden
Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Chris McDonough