python-dev
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Guido van Rossum Thu Jul 12 18:06:18 2007
Please use self.assertEqual() instead of self.failUnlessEqual() -- the assertEqual() form is much more common. Otherwise, good idea! On 7/11/07, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steven Bethard wrote: > > I'd probably go with something a little more restrictive, maybe: > > > > r'self.assert_\(\S+ == \S+\)' > > > > Something like that ought to have fewer false positives. > > Woops! You are right. Even your pattern has caused some false positives > but I've reread the patch and removed the offending lines. I'm going to > upload another patch as soon as I have verified mine again. > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexiscircle%40gmail.com
- [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Guido van Rossum
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Christian Heimes
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Thomas Heller
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Guido van Rossum
- Message not available
- Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Steve Holden
Re: [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni Chris McDonough