python-dev
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Antoine Pitrou Tue Mar 17 16:00:51 2009
Raymond Hettinger <python <at> rcn.com> writes: > > I'm sure that consistency/completeness/safe_vs_sorry > was the reason they were added. But, if they aren't useful, > they never should have been (IMO). It wastes the time of > people who try to use them and then find-out that they don't > act as expected (the assignment doesn't take place) >>> l = [] >>> operator.iadd(l, [5]) [5] >>> l [5] The operation /does/ occur in-place for mutable types. Yes, the semantics are non-obvious for non-mutable types, but that doesn't make it completely useless. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexiscircle%40gmail.com
- [Python-Dev] In-place operators Raymond Hettinger
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Benjamin Peterson
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Guido van Rossum
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Raymond Hettinger
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Antoine Pitrou <=
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Martin v. Löwis
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Raymond Hettinger
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Martin v. Löwis
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Raymond Hettinger
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Nick Coghlan
- Message not available
- Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Hrvoje Niksic
Re: [Python-Dev] In-place operators Terry Reedy