python-dev

Filippo Battaglia wrote:
> Thanks for your answers. Sorry for the title in upper case. I didn't
> want to create troubles.
> :)
>
> I've an important question for you: is it
> possible that a large python module,
> created using SWIG and with a hundred
> of routines, makes slower the execution
> (i.e. the job of ceval.c) of the Python
> interpreter ?

If you were running on a PC with what is now considered to be very small 
memory, I would hypothesize that you had filled memory so that the 
interpreter or parts thereof were being swapped in and out of memory 
from and to disk. Is any thing like that possible with the PSP?

Next, I would wonder whether any module, as part of its initialization, 
was doing anything 'unusual' with respect to its interaction with the 
interpreter.
> We've observed that, if we don't import
> ndpsp.pyc at startup, the time of execution
> of a loop containing the pass instruction
> becomes near normal.

What happens if you divide the imported stuff in half?
Do both halves slow it down? Neither? Just one?

The answer to that would be a start to answering whether the specific 
problem is quantitative or qualitative.

Terry Jan Reedy

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/alexiscircle%40gmail.com