quicktime-java
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich Wed Oct 15 10:00:57 2008
I agree with Chris with one caveat. It's perfectly reasonable for Apple to
stop giving away as powerful a technology as QT if it chooses to for business
or technical reasons. Having said that, the Java support, at least for
desktop/Swing, is still lagging on the Mac. The rendering pipeline alone is
quite shocking and requires JOGL for anything remoetly challenging. The is in
no small part to the lagging 1.6 support. Apple certainly hasn't done much to
champion Java and Jobs' own words to the effect of "Java is dead" belie the
point.
--Alex
--- On Wed, 10/15/08, Chris Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Chris Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats
for QDGraphics)
To: "Jason Proctor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 7:01 AM
On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Jason Proctor wrote:
also yes it looks like QTJ is soon going to be another victim of Apple's
gradual withdrawal from Java, which is a massive own goal IMHO. the QTJ
component of this system is not expected to be long-lived (thankfully).
I disagree with the way you're coloring that statement. IMHO, it's more valid
to say that QTJ is a victim of Apple's gradual withdrawal from Carbon. QTJ is
a set of OO bindings around the classic, procedural C QuickTime API, which is
clearly headed for obsolescence (already can't run in 64-bit mode, for example).
If you want to complain that Apple hasn't provided a Java wrapper around the
modern QTKit API, fine, but do try to think about how it would be in Apple's
best interest to do so. Considering the poor and declining state of desktop
Java, and Sun's stated intent to develop a new cross-platform media API of its
own (Java Media Components, an offshoot of JavaFX), I think Apple's disinterest
in the topic is entirely understandable. They don't, and shouldn't, have a dog
in this fight.
IMHO, Java media support should be Sun's problem, not Apple's, if they have any
serious interest in promoting Java as a desktop platform. Unfortunately, Sun
has little competence, experience, credibility, talent, or passion when it
comes to media, so I don't expect much from JMC.
--Chris
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
QuickTime-java mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-java/ashayk1%40yahoo.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. QuickTime-java mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-java/alexiscircle%40gmail.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- legal pixel formats for QDGraphics Jason Proctor
- Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics jeremy . wood
- Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics Jason Proctor
- "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Chris Adamson
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Paul Loy
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Chris Adamson
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Peter Woods
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) anthony rogers
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich <=
- Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics Jeremy Wood