quicktime-java
[Prev] Thread [Next] | [Prev] Date [Next]
Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Peter Woods Wed Oct 15 10:01:10 2008
> Apple may not really be interested in you writing for non-Mac platforms. And > that > really can't be a surprise, right? What about Apple writing for non-Mac platforms ? Where, for example, does that leave the Windows versions of QuickTime and iTunes ? It seems that Apple may have decided that there's neither value nor benefit in developing or supporting multi-platform media technology, leaving the likes of Adobe and Microsoft with an open field. I believe that is a huge strategic mistake. QuickTime was (and, in some areas, still is) ahead of the game but Apple have so publicly neglected it's too late to save. I suppose the only consolation is that, unlike OpenDoc, only a few misguided developers will lose out when Steve "puts a bullet through the head of QuickTime"... Peter 2008/10/15 Chris Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Oct 15, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Paul Loy wrote: > >> This is exactly why Apple should still be bothered about Java Media >> Support. None of us who have worked with QTJ expect much, if anything, from >> Sun. We all depend on Apple. And that's why it cuts so deep that Apple can't >> even be bothered to tell us what's going to happen to QTJ or what we can >> expect in the future. Apple are so good about seeding developers in other >> areas. Why not here too? > > I hope this doesn't turn into a pissing match, but I guess I see no answer > as an answer: QTJ is so dead to Apple that they don't even indulge the > topic. They've been pretty clear at how you're supposed to write a Mac > media app going forward: use QTKit, or Core Audio/Video if working at that > level makes more sense for you. That doesn't address how you write a > cross-platform media app, but again, maybe that silence is the point: Apple > may not really be interested in you writing for non-Mac platforms. And that > really can't be a surprise, right? > > There's also a difference in the information available to developers who > went to WWDC versus those who didn't, but of course, that's NDA. > > --Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > QuickTime-java mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-java/peter.woods%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. QuickTime-java mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quicktime-java/alexiscircle%40gmail.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- legal pixel formats for QDGraphics Jason Proctor
- Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics jeremy . wood
- Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics Jason Proctor
- "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Chris Adamson
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Paul Loy
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Chris Adamson
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Peter Woods <=
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) anthony rogers
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich
- Re: "Apple's gradual withdrawal from Java" (was: Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics) Alex Shaykevich
- Re: legal pixel formats for QDGraphics Jeremy Wood